Talk:Programming Conventions: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Sorry, yes, I've been in the process of translating the page from HTML so keep noticing things and making amendments. Hopefully the basic structure/layout/conversion is complete now. --[[User:Adamr|Adamr]] 15:03, 8 Jan 2007 (GMT) |
Sorry, yes, I've been in the process of translating the page from HTML so keep noticing things and making amendments. Hopefully the basic structure/layout/conversion is complete now. --[[User:Adamr|Adamr]] 15:03, 8 Jan 2007 (GMT) |
||
---- |
|||
Re, Pnaulls' comment: |
|||
The following is opinion of Adam Richardson and may |
|||
or may not be agreed with by other RISC OS programmers. |
|||
I do not intend this page to simply be "my" view of the world. If that were the intention I would have left it on my website. I would rather that it gives a consensus view (if that's possible). |
|||
When I first published the article on my website I asked for comments on comp.sys.acorn.programmer and no major issues were raised. The only thing approaching being controversial was the bit about placing modules inside !System. |
|||
Peter, are there any specific parts of the document you think ought to be changed/removed? |
|||
--[[User:Adamr|Adamr]] 17:10, 8 Jan 2007 (GMT) |
|||
Revision as of 17:10, 8 January 2007
Please use the preview button to show how things look, instead of endless change log entries.
Sorry, yes, I've been in the process of translating the page from HTML so keep noticing things and making amendments. Hopefully the basic structure/layout/conversion is complete now. --Adamr 15:03, 8 Jan 2007 (GMT)
Re, Pnaulls' comment:
The following is opinion of Adam Richardson and may or may not be agreed with by other RISC OS programmers.
I do not intend this page to simply be "my" view of the world. If that were the intention I would have left it on my website. I would rather that it gives a consensus view (if that's possible).
When I first published the article on my website I asked for comments on comp.sys.acorn.programmer and no major issues were raised. The only thing approaching being controversial was the bit about placing modules inside !System.
Peter, are there any specific parts of the document you think ought to be changed/removed?
--Adamr 17:10, 8 Jan 2007 (GMT)
