User:Jymbob: Difference between revisions

From RISC OS
Jump to navigationJump to search
(reply to GWraith)
(removed site redesign discussion)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
Got married in June.
Got married in June.


Looking for the [[Site redesign]] discussion? It now has its own page.
===Site re-design===
Please leave comments about site re-design below.

I'll get back to you.

Well Jymbob, it is February 2008 now. I am not sure whether ro-connect and
ro-future are in anyway competitors to ro-info. I am sorry to say that ro-info
appears to be moribund, judging by those "last modified" dates. It could well
be that the depressing appearance of the site is partly to blame (I am
using NetSurf as default browser). The font is rather mean and small, text
straggles off to the right. What is needed is for users to be able to edit
their own css files. Designing a one-style-for-all system is hopelessly
fascist. For those whom css daunts, providing a selection of default files, which users could then personalize and play with, would be appropriate. The current style, which I have seen on many wikis, I do not like - it looks mean,
somehow. I guess it comes down to how flexible the off-the-peg wiki is.
[[User:GavinW|GavinW]]

To answer your questions as best I can:
"RISC OS Connect does not seek to replace various other on-line efforts such as riscos.info and RISC OS Open." from their website. I haven't personally come across ro-future (and googling doesn't seem to help), so couldn't comment.

What ro-info could do with regarding updates is someone to collate useful information. At the moment, it's something of a mish-mash of software reviews, hardware information and technical pages about the GCC project. I've a feeling the front page is a large part of the issue with this, but I can't personally work out what it <em>should</em> look like. I'd agree the front page is rather uninspiring.

Regarding CSS files, please understand that I don't have access to the ftp for riscos.info so I have no way to edit any CSS files used on the site. I'd tend to agree that several different CSS files should be optional. However, I was planning on improving the look of the default site first. I have so far received no suggestions about how the site should look. If you have any ideas I'd be more than happy to hear them and try to implement them.

I often view the site in Netsurf with no real issues.

I can't see any easy way of providing an editable CSS file for each user, but someone with more experience of how a MediaWiki is put together might know of something.

Might I suggest you try out some of the different styles listed in your preferences? you can just add "&useskin=cologneblue" to the end of a URL for a quick view of one of the other options.

If you could send me a screenshot of what you mean by "The font is rather mean and small, text straggles off to the right" I'll see if I can suggest a solution. jymbob@ntlworld.com will get to me fairly quickly. [[User:Jymbob|Jymbob]] 14:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:21, 21 March 2008

Jymbob is a wannabe RISC OS programmer, but he's not actually all that competent, yet.

He's the maintainer of Cretin, a fully 32bit IRC client, and can usually be found in #riscos and #cretin on IRCNet.

Idea: Multiple users, a simple, RISC OS savvy suggestion

Got married in June.

Looking for the Site redesign discussion? It now has its own page.