User:Trevj: Difference between revisions

From RISC OS
Jump to navigationJump to search
(RO usage)
(add link to 'Low Cost ARM Computer' blog post by Andrew Bradford)
Line 3: Line 3:
I'm excited that RISC OS is evolving rather than stagnating and have recently (2010) been following developments fairly closely (having found a little more time available to do so).
I'm excited that RISC OS is evolving rather than stagnating and have recently (2010) been following developments fairly closely (having found a little more time available to do so).
*My current limitations on technical knowledge mean that I've written no RISC OS software.
*My current limitations on technical knowledge mean that I've written no RISC OS software.
*I'd like to see a RISC OS hardware project owned and managed by the RISC OS community under a cooperative business model.
*I'd like to see a RISC OS hardware project owned and managed by the RISC&nbsp;OS community under a cooperative business model. <small>(Perhaps [http://bradfordembedded.blogspot.com/2011/02/low-cost-arm-computer.html these thoughts from Andrew Bradford] may prove useful in the future.)</small>
*I use RO6 on a RiscPC and RO5 on a BeagleBoard.
*I use RO6 on a RiscPC and RO5 on a BeagleBoard.

Revision as of 09:38, 28 February 2011

Trevor Johnson

I'm excited that RISC OS is evolving rather than stagnating and have recently (2010) been following developments fairly closely (having found a little more time available to do so).

  • My current limitations on technical knowledge mean that I've written no RISC OS software.
  • I'd like to see a RISC OS hardware project owned and managed by the RISC OS community under a cooperative business model. (Perhaps these thoughts from Andrew Bradford may prove useful in the future.)
  • I use RO6 on a RiscPC and RO5 on a BeagleBoard.