Talk:RISC OS Samba Server

From RISC OS

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Article needs cleanup)
(Status)
 
(2 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
[[User:Jymbob|Jymbob]] 11:15, 19 Apr 2007 (BST)
[[User:Jymbob|Jymbob]] 11:15, 19 Apr 2007 (BST)
 +
 +
Yes, I've stripped it down as a temporary measure. Hopefully once the situation is cleared up, someone with knowledge of the project will update the page.<br>[[User:Adamr|Adamr]] 12:55, 19 Apr 2007 (BST)
 +
----
 +
I think this page should stick to facts. There are two versions of smbserver. Also, this site should try and avoid "controversial" comments. I suggest one of the following:
 +
* Delete this page; or
 +
* Add a link to the other smbserver branch (e.g. reinstate something like [http://www.riscos.info/index.php?title=RISC_OS_Samba_Server&oldid=2047 this page])
 +
[[User:Adamr|Adamr]] 11:13, 6 Jul 2007 (BST)
 +
 +
== Status ==
 +
 +
The page is accurate.  As in the FAQ, there's no point listing every last detail.  This site cannot condone totally unjustified forking.

Latest revision as of 10:51, 6 July 2007

This article is in serious need of a cleanup, preferably by someone who knows what the current state of play is.

As it stands, it may as well not be here at all.

Jymbob 11:15, 19 Apr 2007 (BST)

Yes, I've stripped it down as a temporary measure. Hopefully once the situation is cleared up, someone with knowledge of the project will update the page.
Adamr 12:55, 19 Apr 2007 (BST)


I think this page should stick to facts. There are two versions of smbserver. Also, this site should try and avoid "controversial" comments. I suggest one of the following:

  • Delete this page; or
  • Add a link to the other smbserver branch (e.g. reinstate something like this page)

Adamr 11:13, 6 Jul 2007 (BST)

Status

The page is accurate. As in the FAQ, there's no point listing every last detail. This site cannot condone totally unjustified forking.

Personal tools