sbellon at sbellon.de
Thu Oct 25 03:36:40 PDT 2001
Nicholas Clark <nick at ccl4.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 11:03:04AM +0100, Nick Burrett wrote:
> > I am not entirely convinced that the pipe function works properly.
> > IIRC, pipe buffers the data in temporary files in /tmp.
> My memory agrees. I think one limitation was that the implementation
> expects the writer to complete all the writing before the reader does
> any ready.
I /think/ this is enough for what will be used in GnuPG. But I'm not
sure at present. In the moment I'm reading through the source of
popen() and pclose()
> I experimented with a version that used a temporary file (in tmp) but
> effectively maintained 2 pointers on it, so that reading and writing
> could be interleaved. (Although I was only doing this in one process,
> the sfio regression tests). Would Stefan find this useful?
I'll keep that in mind. And whenever I need reading and writing
interleaved, I'll come back to you.
Another point is: How difficult would it be to use PipeFS for all pipe
operations instead of a temporary file? Concerning GnuPG, it's always
best not to store things on permanent storage if possible.
Stefan Bellon * <mailto:sbellon at sbellon.de> * <http://www.sbellon.de/>
PGP 2 and OpenPGP keys available from my home page
Better to understand a little than to misunderstand a lot.
More information about the gcc