UnixLib and the GPL
nick at dsvr.net
Wed Jun 9 00:17:03 PDT 2004
John Tytgat wrote:
> In message <b396fbbb4c.peter at chocky.org>
> Peter Naulls <peter at chocky.org> wrote:
>>As for iconv et al - does this really need to be in UL? It is easily
>>compiled any linked when needed.
> True, that's my experience too. But I was thinking to support at
> least the standard RISC OS encodings to/from UTF-8 and if an additional
> iconv RISC OS module is present, most (all ?) other iconv encodings could
> be supported too. With shared libraries this wouldn't be necessary.
I had thought about this some time ago and had considered and partially
implemented such a facility. Then I heard that RISC OS was going to get
internationalisation support, so I decided to not bother with this
avenue until that was complete. Otherwise we'd probably end up with two
I don't know whether it is still the intention of RISC OS to get UTF-8
or UTF-16 support, or maybe I just had a bad dream one night.
Nick Burrett, Senior Systems and Network Engineer
Designer Servers Ltd. http://www.dsvr.co.uk
More information about the gcc