RE_DUP_MAX redefinition

Peter Naulls peter at chocky.org
Mon Jun 14 14:20:16 PDT 2004


In message <e55f18bf4c.Jo at hobbes.bass-software.com>
          John Tytgat <John.Tytgat at aaug.net> wrote:

> UnixLib on the CVS trunk contains two different definitions for RE_DUP_MAX.
> A #include of regex.h and then limits.h stops compilation (but not when
> the include happens in different order, cfr source).  Any suggestion to
> solve this ? Increase both instances of RE_DUP_MAX to (1<<31) - 1 ?

I would look at what glibc has, and probably go by that, if it's
sensible.

-- 
Peter Naulls - peter at chocky.org        | http://www.chocky.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please Reply Properly - http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/quote.html




More information about the gcc mailing list