[gccsdk] Packaging compiler - was Autobuilder libraries

Peter Naulls peter at chocky.org
Wed Jan 9 21:01:10 PST 2008

In message <BAY101-W3964EFAC134AB1DE8966CDF0480 at phx.gbl>
          alan buckley <alan_baa at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Before I do that it may be worth making a copy of the existing site
> to another package list. If so which one unstable, testing ...?

I don't think it's worth making a distinction.  Simply replace or add to
them with the ELF built packages as you go along.  After all, it isn't
going to matter much to the user.

> I assume the AOF versions of the libraries will all need to be replaced
> with ELF versions. Is there any benefit in keeping the AOF versions
> available?

Maybe not that much.  Most of the libraries have now had a rework, so
would probably need to be updated in any case.

Peter Naulls - peter at chocky.org        | http://www.chocky.org/
RISC OS Community Wiki - add your own content   | http://www.riscos.info/

More information about the gcc mailing list