[gccsdk] Autobuilder build report
Peter Naulls
peter at chocky.org
Sun Aug 2 14:09:05 PDT 2009
Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote:
Please don't remove attributions.
>> This is the latest. If any of these packages belong to you, you might
>> want to take a look.
>
>> ./develop/vala: (failed)
>> ./develop/vala/libvala0: (not attempted)
>
> What is the problem with these? Seems to build just fine here:
>
> Autobuilder: Package stage completed
> Package vala: Success
>
Nothing, but you weren't replying to the most recent
message where I said they all built.
[gnutls]
>/home/jjvdgeer/cross/bin/../arm-unknown-riscos/lib/libunixlib.a(getaddrinfo.o):
In function `getnameinfo':
>
/home/jjvdgeer/gccsdk/gcc4/srcdir/libunixlib/netlib/getaddrinfo.c:515:
multiple definition of `getnameinfo'
>
/home/jjvdgeer/cross/bin/../arm-unknown-riscos/lib/libunixlib.a(getnameinfo.o):/home/jjvdgeer/gccsdk/gcc4/srcdir/libunixlib/netlib/getnameinfo.c:143:
first defined here
>
/home/jjvdgeer/cross/lib/gcc/arm-unknown-riscos/4.1.1/../../../../arm-unknown-riscos/bin/ld:
Warning: size of symbol `getnameinfo' changed from 1012 in
/home/jjvdgeer/cross/bin/../arm-unknown-riscos/lib/libunixlib.a(getnameinfo.o)
to 540 in
/home/jjvdgeer/cross/bin/../arm-unknown-riscos/lib/libunixlib.a(getaddrinfo.o)
[snip]
>
> Doesn't mean much to me.
Well, it's really not that hard. It tells you precisely what is wrong -
a multiple definition of the same symbol. But I see John is on top of
this already. Why I didn't see the error, I don't know, however.
More information about the gcc
mailing list