[gccsdk] Autobuilder build report

Peter Naulls peter at chocky.org
Sun Aug 2 14:09:05 PDT 2009


Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote:

Please don't remove attributions.

>> This is the latest.  If any of these packages belong to you, you might
>> want to take a look.
> 
>> ./develop/vala: (failed)
>> ./develop/vala/libvala0: (not attempted)
> 
> What is the problem with these? Seems to build just fine here:
> 
> Autobuilder: Package stage completed
> Package vala: Success
> 

Nothing, but you weren't replying to the most recent
message where I said they all built.

[gnutls]

 >/home/jjvdgeer/cross/bin/../arm-unknown-riscos/lib/libunixlib.a(getaddrinfo.o): 
In function `getnameinfo':
 > 
/home/jjvdgeer/gccsdk/gcc4/srcdir/libunixlib/netlib/getaddrinfo.c:515: 
multiple definition of `getnameinfo'
 > 
/home/jjvdgeer/cross/bin/../arm-unknown-riscos/lib/libunixlib.a(getnameinfo.o):/home/jjvdgeer/gccsdk/gcc4/srcdir/libunixlib/netlib/getnameinfo.c:143: 
first defined here
 > 
/home/jjvdgeer/cross/lib/gcc/arm-unknown-riscos/4.1.1/../../../../arm-unknown-riscos/bin/ld: 
Warning: size of symbol `getnameinfo' changed from 1012 in 
/home/jjvdgeer/cross/bin/../arm-unknown-riscos/lib/libunixlib.a(getnameinfo.o) 
to 540 in 
/home/jjvdgeer/cross/bin/../arm-unknown-riscos/lib/libunixlib.a(getaddrinfo.o)

[snip]

 >
 > Doesn't mean much to me.

Well, it's really not that hard.  It tells you precisely what is wrong -
a multiple definition of the same symbol.  But I see John is on top of 
this already.  Why I didn't see the error, I don't know, however.






More information about the gcc mailing list