[gccsdk] libapr
Chris Gransden
chrisg at care4free.net
Sun Jan 3 10:31:37 PST 2010
Peter Naulls wrote:
> Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote:
>> Some time ago I updated the patches for subversion. Although it compiles
>> fine, it crashes when it is invoked.
>>
>> I've played a little bit with it, but have not found out what the
>> problem is. All crashes seem to be happening in libapr1. An example
>> here:
>>
>
> There seems to be some memory problem with libapr. I've been running
> its test programs, and "testall" in particular with debugging on has
> problems:
>
> ...
> POOL DEBUG: [136173925] PALLOC ( 13472/ 13472/ 13540)
> 0x7f7f8 "testutil.c:43" <strings/apr_strings.c:78> (92/92/0)
> POOL DEBUG: [136173925] PALLOC ( 17568/ 17568/ 17636)
> 0x7f7f8 "testutil.c:43" <file_io/unix/open.c:180> (93/93/0) |POOL
> DEBUG: [136173925] PCALLOC ( 17636/ 17636/ 17704) 0x7f7f8
> "testutil.c:43" <file_io/unix/open.c:169> (94/94/0)
> POOL DEBUG: [136173925] PALLOC ( 17656/ 17656/ 17724)
> 0x7f7f8 "testutil.c:43" <strings/apr_strings.c:78> (95/95/0)
> POOL DEBUG: [136173925] PALLOC ( 17679/ 17679/ 17747)
> 0x7f7f8 "testutil.c:43" <testfile.c:571> (96/96/0) |POOL DEBUG:
> [136173925] LIFE 0x80838
> <memory/unix/apr_pools.c:apr_pool_integrity check>
>
> Fatal signal received: Aborted
>
> Stack backtrace:
>
> Running thread 0x75d30
> ( 376e34) pc: 4f640 lr: 4fc54 sp: 376e38 __write_backtrace()
> ( 376e9c) pc: 4f7f8 lr: 4ec94 sp: 376ea0
> __unixlib_raise_signal()
> ( 376eac) pc: 4ec68 lr: 38ce4 sp: 376eb0 raise()
> ( 376ec0) pc: 38ca8 lr: 28de4 sp: 376ec4 abort()
> ( 376ee0) pc: 28c18 lr: 28e30 sp: 376ee4
> apr_pool_cleanup_kill()
> ( 376ef8) pc: 28e1c lr: e068 sp: 376efc
> apr_pool_cleanup_run()
> ( 376f28) pc: dfa4 lr: f310 sp: 376f2c
> ^file_contents_equal()
> ( 376f80) pc: f270 lr: 95a8 sp: 376f84 ^test_writev()
> ( 376fac) pc: 94f4 lr: d48c sp: 376fb0 abts_run_test()
> ( 376fc0) pc: d31c lr: 8444 sp: 376fc4 testfile()
> ( 376ff4) pc: 8334 lr: 5d6e0 sp: 376ff8 main()
>
>
> This is a static binary, and I have turned off threading and other
> things which might be causing a problem. This seems to be triggered
> by, or around the "writev" test in testall.
>
> Apart from that, in some of its other tests, John and I have seen
> instabilities in running shared library versions of some of the
> tests in a taskwindow, where other applications would be taken
> out with an abort - e.g, testshmconsumer.
>
> Also in the shared library library version of the 'testall' with debug
> off, it would first crash with a segmentation fault, and then
> a repeat run would give a much earlier crash with an illegal
> instruction - this is cleared by reloading the SOManager module.
> However, this might be a side effect of the memory problems seen
> in the first case above, but does suggest some unhelpful state
> stored by SOManager.
I noticed there had just been some changes to unixlib. I rebuilt
everything and managed to check out netsurf without subversion crashing. :)
Chris.
More information about the gcc
mailing list