[Rpcemu] RISC OS 5.17 benchmarked against 4.02
old_coaster at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Oct 23 12:45:02 PDT 2012
On 23 Oct 2012, george greenfield <george.greenfield at tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> I recently ran Richard Spencers benchmarking app romark 1.01 on both
> my RPCEmu installations (0.8.8
Any reason for not using 0.8.9?
> /5.17 and 0.8.9/4.02 respectively). Here
> are the results (0.8.8/5.17 first, % advantage of 0.8.8/5.17 last):
or 0.8.9/4.02 last?
[snip results, etc]
> ... I find the degree of difference generally, and in particular,
> HD/FS Read/Writes and Icon plotting, surprising.
More information about the Rpcemu