nick at dsvr.net
Tue Dec 11 01:07:59 PST 2001
Peter Naulls <peter at chocky.org> writes:
> In message <20011206200607.Y21702 at plum.flirble.org>
> Nicholas Clark <nick at ccl4.org> wrote:
> > What happens if user code does os_cli() on something that turns out to be
> > a new task?
> Except in cases like this. I'm not sure what's the best here. But
> removing it certainly seems to be the lesser of two evils right now.
The ugly hack solution would be to save and restore the handlers
in the `os_cli' function. I don't think this is a good idea though.
More information about the gcc