nick at dsvr.net
Tue Apr 15 02:51:00 PDT 2003
Peter Naulls wrote:
> I'm also particularly interested in any regressions, which might
> indicate any missing fixes. GCC 2.95.4 has done us good service, but
> it's getting long in the tooth in places, and it's time to move on.
> I will try and provide binaries for a 32-bit 3.3 GCC as soon as I'm
> able in the usual place, but without source (you should use CVS).
I think you'll have problems with the 3.3 C++ stuff because of the
missing features of wchar from UnixLib.
Network Engineer, Designer Servers Ltd. http://www.dsvr.co.uk
More information about the gcc