32 bit gccsdk

Philip Ludlam philip at philipnet.com
Sat Oct 11 04:47:46 PDT 2003


On 11 Oct, in message <df30993f4c.peter at chocky.org>
  Peter Naulls <peter at chocky.org> wrote:

>In message <200310110128.48923.mail at peter-teichmann.de>
>          Peter Teichmann <mail at peter-teichmann.de> wrote:
>
>> Am Freitag, 10. Oktober 2003 19:52 schrieb Philip Ludlam:
>> > On 9 Oct, in message <6fc7e43e4c.David at illudium.org.uk>
>> >
>> >   David Marston <david at illudium.org.uk> wrote:
>> > >In message <200310092337.44754.mail at peter-teichmann.de>
>> > >
>> > >There was a change committed to the assembler in CVS earlier this week
>> > >which has upset a few things unfortunately.
>> >
>> > If it has, gccsdk is under CVS so it's easy to do something like:
>> > cvs -z5 update -Pd -D 2003/10/01
>> > (that's the ISO format date: YYYY/MM/DD)
>> 
>> Great idea! Why did that not come to my mind? It seems to fix this special 
>> problem. It compiles Unixlib now, but fails when compiling the RISC OS gcc, 
>> so there seems to be another problem. Does someone know an exact
>> date when he  was able to get and compile a complete usable 32bit
>> gccsdk ;-)
>
>[ snip breakage ]
>
>Yes, it does.  I'm afraid the advice wasn't particulary great :-|

You're right.
I get errors like: Error: Size of Common Block 'C$$bss' in 'globals.o'
differs from its definition in 'folds.o' now :-( .
Back to the latest I go.

Yours,

Phil L.
-- 
http://www.philipnet.com                http://director.sourceforge.net
                i ou a uea i e a o ie e a o a a oue oae





More information about the gcc mailing list