Common areas and as
nick at dsvr.net
Thu Oct 30 01:52:05 PST 2003
David Marston wrote:
> In message <3F9CE5C6.8080505 at dsvr.net>
> Nick Burrett <nick at dsvr.net> wrote:
>>Thanks for the analysis. I get the impression that we aren't making
>>symbol 'x' an member of area 'x'. We probably aren't generating a
>>relocation at all.
> They were there, just wrong. I've found the problem now, and can't
> believe I didn't see it the first time given I'd changed the same piece
> of logic in quite a few places already.
> (It's the changes in reloc.c in particular that are for this problem,
> but I thought I'd make sure it was changed everywhere)
Looking at your patch, I was sure I had made exactly the same fixes.
However on closer inspection, I forgot to change reloc.c. :-)
Running the testsuite now gives me one expected failure. It appears
that at least the C compiler is now up to scratch.
I'm now running the libstdc++ testsuite which will take a few hours.
Network Engineer, Designer Servers Ltd. http://www.dsvr.co.uk
More information about the gcc