cvs: wwwdocs /gcc index.html

Peter Naulls peter at chocky.org
Sun Mar 21 02:57:22 PST 2004


In message <405D7294.6060401 at dsvr.net>
          Nick Burrett <nick at dsvr.net> wrote:

> Alex Waugh wrote:
> >
> > I don't see any reason for not supporting 26-bit operating systems.
> 
> I can't see a good reason for supporting 26-bit operating systems.  IIRC 
> it was mentioned that 32-bit apps work on the 26-bit OS anyway.

These are conflicting statements.  By producing 32-bit code, we are
supporting both 26-bit and 32-bit Operating Systems.  Certainly, we
don't support 26-bit only code, and there's no particular reason to do
so.

-- 
Peter Naulls - peter at chocky.org        | http://www.chocky.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AcornSearch - http://www.drobe.co.uk/  | Relevant RISC OS searches




More information about the gcc mailing list