cvs: wwwdocs /gcc index.html

Nick Burrett nick at dsvr.net
Sun Mar 21 14:19:02 PST 2004


Peter Naulls wrote:
> In message <405D7294.6060401 at dsvr.net>
>           Nick Burrett <nick at dsvr.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Alex Waugh wrote:
>>
>>>I don't see any reason for not supporting 26-bit operating systems.
>>
>>I can't see a good reason for supporting 26-bit operating systems.  IIRC 
>>it was mentioned that 32-bit apps work on the 26-bit OS anyway.
> 
> 
> These are conflicting statements.  By producing 32-bit code, we are
> supporting both 26-bit and 32-bit Operating Systems.  Certainly, we
> don't support 26-bit only code, and there's no particular reason to do
> so.

So dropping support for 26-bit code is a non-issue.  I don't really see 
what the problem was with what I originally wrote, albeit it could have 
been explained a little better.

BTW, 26-bit output is now deprecated in GCC 3.4 and will be removed from 
GCC 3.5.

Regards,


Nick.







More information about the gcc mailing list