cvs: wwwdocs /gcc index.html
nick at dsvr.net
Sun Mar 21 14:19:02 PST 2004
Peter Naulls wrote:
> In message <405D7294.6060401 at dsvr.net>
> Nick Burrett <nick at dsvr.net> wrote:
>>Alex Waugh wrote:
>>>I don't see any reason for not supporting 26-bit operating systems.
>>I can't see a good reason for supporting 26-bit operating systems. IIRC
>>it was mentioned that 32-bit apps work on the 26-bit OS anyway.
> These are conflicting statements. By producing 32-bit code, we are
> supporting both 26-bit and 32-bit Operating Systems. Certainly, we
> don't support 26-bit only code, and there's no particular reason to do
So dropping support for 26-bit code is a non-issue. I don't really see
what the problem was with what I originally wrote, albeit it could have
been explained a little better.
BTW, 26-bit output is now deprecated in GCC 3.4 and will be removed from
More information about the gcc