[gccsdk] GCC 3.4.6 and Softfloat
david.brown at eu.citrix.com
Tue Jan 16 15:55:05 PST 2007
It looks like that one was caused by one of the build tools being
missing/the wrong version. John's (Mark Bell) apt-get seems to have
I'm currently doing a complete rebuild to see how far it gets now. I
think I may also have had too early a version of automake installed so
the build may well get further :)
Thanks for all your help so far.
From: gcc-bounces at gccsdk.riscos.info
[mailto:gcc-bounces at gccsdk.riscos.info] On Behalf Of John Tytgat
Sent: 16 January 2007 23:02
To: gcc at gccsdk.riscos.info
Subject: Re: [gccsdk] GCC 3.4.6 and Softfloat
<DD74FBB8EE28D441903D56487861CD9D07B7B5D7 at lonpexch01.citrite.net>
"David Brown" <david.brown at eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> John Tytgat wrote:
> > Can you confirm you're using a GCC 4.1.1 snapshot with binutils 2.17
> > for those I expect to see a perfect patch match. I don't think
> > our patches can be applied to next versions without updating but
> > believe the updating would require minor effort for someone who's a
> > familiar with the code and knows what the patches do and why.
> Yes, I downloaded both of these as tar.bz files from the GNU site.
> I can now confirm that the patch file that couldn't be applied was
That's odd. But is not a vital one. Can you send me offlist your
srcdir/gcc/contrib/gcc_update file and the output of the failed patch?
John Tytgat, in his comfy chair at home
John.Tytgat at aaug.net ARM powered, RISC OS
GCCSDK mailing list gcc at gccsdk.riscos.info
List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc
Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
More information about the gcc