[gccsdk] [GCCSDK commit] joty - r2742 - in trunk/gcc4/riscos/dist/!GCC: . docs
alex at alexwaugh.com
Mon Jul 30 13:25:29 PDT 2007
John Tytgat <John.Tytgat at aaug.net> wrote:
> In message <34a72e0a4f.ajw498 at caramel.cp15.org>
> Alex Waugh <alex at alexwaugh.com> wrote:
> > In message <E1IFEqD-0005EG-Gg at riscos.info> you wrote:
> > > Author: joty
> > > Date: 2007-07-29 20:54:12 +0100 (Sun, 29 Jul 2007)
> > > New Revision: 2742
> > >
> > > Modified:
> > > trunk/gcc4/riscos/dist/!GCC/!Run,feb
> > > trunk/gcc4/riscos/dist/!GCC/docs/index.html
> > > Log:
> > > More documentation; made aliases for cc and c++
> > Why add aliases? Isn't it going to cause problem for people who also use
> > Norcroft?
> Mmh, you have a point there. Main reason was to avoid dubble binaries
> (not that it makes such a difference as the kit already quite large).
> Another question: do we need cc and c++ executables ? There were not there
> in the GCCSDK 3.4 kits either. So perhaps I should simply leave them out.
For the cross compiler, they are useful. But for the native compiler I
don't see any point, as any ported makefiles typically need much more
than just the compiler name changing.
Alex Waugh alex at alexwaugh.com
PHP, Roots, Subversion, WebJames and more from http://www.alexwaugh.com/
More information about the gcc