[gccsdk] Are you happy for me to package Firefox?
jmb202 at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Wed Mar 21 03:44:21 PDT 2007
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 21:36 -0700, Peter Naulls wrote:
> The specific problems are:
> - I don't think that manual packaing of the existing binary is a
> solution. It needs to be an automated, scalable part of the
> existing autobuilder process.
> - The same applies to the other components. Yes, some of those are
> packaged on the NetSurf site, but these need to be hosted on
> riscos.info as a complete solution.
For the SUL and DigitalRenderer; certainly. For the others, I'm not
convinced at present.
> Also you mentioned on the Wiki coversion to an AOF. This is all very
> well, but pretty soon, everyone will need ELFLoader anyway, like they
> needed the 32-bit SCL. Any further development of Firefox will also
> mean use of shared libraries, so will demaned ELF.
I would rather that the current ELFLoader was _not_ packaged. It is a
dead end in development terms (and will be entirely replaced by Lee's
efforts in due course).
More information about the gcc