RaFS: Difference between revisions
From RISC OS
Jump to navigationJump to search
Simon Smith (talk | contribs) (Altered template) |
Simon Smith (talk | contribs) (Changed long filename systems link) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Note that if RISC OS 3.1 is being run under [[RedSquirrel]], it is not affected by the infamous 77-file-per-directory limit. RedSquirrel uses HostFS and thus supports long file names and unlimited files per directory. |
Note that if RISC OS 3.1 is being run under [[RedSquirrel]], it is not affected by the infamous 77-file-per-directory limit. RedSquirrel uses HostFS and thus supports long file names and unlimited files per directory. |
||
This article on [[Long Filename Systems]] contains a discussion of the different long filename storage philosophies between LongFiles, raFS and X-Files. |
|||
Revision as of 10:21, 22 November 2007
| raFS | |
| Icon: |  |
|---|---|
| Maintained by: | Richard Atterer |
| Description: | raFS allows users of RISC OS 3.71 and below to have as many files in a single directory as they wish, which they cannot do without raFS, or some other similar application. |
| OS Restrictions: | Not 32-bit compatible |
| Languages: | Dutch, English, German |
| Alternatives: | ArcFS, SparkFS, X-Files, other image filing systems |
| Website: | http://atterer.net/riscos.html |
Historical Notes
RISC OS has had long filename support since the release of RISC OS 4 in 1999, so this utility would only be needed for those using very old versions of RISC OS, or those trying to retrieve old data saved on old-format disks (E or F format or earlier) under RISC OS versions 3.71 and earlier.
Note that if RISC OS 3.1 is being run under RedSquirrel, it is not affected by the infamous 77-file-per-directory limit. RedSquirrel uses HostFS and thus supports long file names and unlimited files per directory.
This article on Long Filename Systems contains a discussion of the different long filename storage philosophies between LongFiles, raFS and X-Files.
