Talk:RISC OS Samba Server: Difference between revisions
From RISC OS
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Discussion) |
(Status) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Yes, I've stripped it down as a temporary measure. Hopefully once the situation is cleared up, someone with knowledge of the project will update the page.<br>[[User:Adamr|Adamr]] 12:55, 19 Apr 2007 (BST) |
Yes, I've stripped it down as a temporary measure. Hopefully once the situation is cleared up, someone with knowledge of the project will update the page.<br>[[User:Adamr|Adamr]] 12:55, 19 Apr 2007 (BST) |
||
---- |
|||
I think this page should stick to facts. There are two versions of smbserver. Also, this site should try and avoid "controversial" comments. I suggest one of the following: |
|||
* Delete this page; or |
|||
* Add a link to the other smbserver branch (e.g. reinstate something like [http://www.riscos.info/index.php?title=RISC_OS_Samba_Server&oldid=2047 this page]) |
|||
[[User:Adamr|Adamr]] 11:13, 6 Jul 2007 (BST) |
|||
== Status == |
|||
The page is accurate. As in the FAQ, there's no point listing every last detail. This site cannot condone totally unjustified forking. |
Latest revision as of 10:51, 6 July 2007
This article is in serious need of a cleanup, preferably by someone who knows what the current state of play is.
As it stands, it may as well not be here at all.
Jymbob 11:15, 19 Apr 2007 (BST)
Yes, I've stripped it down as a temporary measure. Hopefully once the situation is cleared up, someone with knowledge of the project will update the page.
Adamr 12:55, 19 Apr 2007 (BST)
I think this page should stick to facts. There are two versions of smbserver. Also, this site should try and avoid "controversial" comments. I suggest one of the following:
- Delete this page; or
- Add a link to the other smbserver branch (e.g. reinstate something like this page)
Adamr 11:13, 6 Jul 2007 (BST)
Status
The page is accurate. As in the FAQ, there's no point listing every last detail. This site cannot condone totally unjustified forking.